Upcoming Issue Highlights
Home Subscribe Advertise Sourcebook Free Product Info Home

Why Sugary Drinks and Protein-rich Meals Don’t Go Well Together

Longevity By Nature

Having a sugar-sweetened drink with a high-protein meal may negatively affect energy balance, alter food preferences and cause the body to store more fat, according to a study published in the open access journal BMC Nutrition.

“We found that about a third of the additional calories provided by the sugar-sweetened drinks were not expended, fat metabolism was reduced, and it took less energy to metabolize the meals,” said Dr. Shanon Casperson, lead author of the study from USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture) Agricultural Research Service Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center. “This decreased metabolic efficiency may ‘prime’ the body to store more fat.”

The researchers found that the inclusion of a sugar-sweetened drink decreased fat oxidation, which kick-starts the breakdown of fat molecules, after a meal by 8 percent. If a sugar-sweetened drink was consumed with a 15 percent protein meal, fat oxidation decreased by 7.2 g on average. If a sugar-sweetened drink was consumed with a 30 percent protein meal, fat oxidation decreased by 12.6 g on average. While having a sugar-sweetened drink increased the amount of energy used to metabolize the meal, the increased expenditure did not even out the consumption of additional calories from the drink.

“We were surprised by the impact that the sugar-sweetened drinks had on metabolism when they were paired with higher-protein meals,” said Dr. Casperson. “This combination also increased study subjects’ desire to eat savory and salty foods for four hours after eating.”

The researchers recruited 27 healthy-weight adults (13 male, 14 female), who were on average 23 years old. Participants made two 24-hour study visits, receiving two 15 percent protein meals (breakfast and lunch) after an overnight fast on one visit and two 30 percent protein meals after an overnight fast on the other visit. The increase in protein was counterbalanced by a decrease in carbohydrates. All meals were composed of the same foods and they provided 17 g of fat and 500 kcals. Participants consumed a sugar-sweetened drink with one of the meals and a non-sugar sweetened drink with the other meal.

The researchers used a room calorimeter, a 25m3 furnished chamber that measures movement, oxygen, carbon dioxide, temperature and pressure, to assess how dietary changes affected energy expenditure and the way nutrients were processed by the body. By having study participants stay in a room calorimeter, researchers can determine how many grams of carbohydrate, protein and fat they are using and how many calories they are burning every minute. Study participants stayed inside the room for the duration of each study visit.

“Our findings suggest that having a sugar-sweetened drink with a meal impacts both sides of the energy balance equation,” said Dr. Casperson. “On the intake side, the additional energy from the drink did not make people feel more sated. On the expenditure side, the additional calories were not expended and fat oxidation was reduced. The results provide further insight into the potential role of sugar-sweetened drinks—the largest single source of sugar in the American diet—in weight gain and obesity.”

Dietary changes were measured only for a short time and caution must be used when extrapolating the study data to dietary changes over longer periods of time. As this study was in healthy-weight adults only, the authors also caution that overweight individuals may respond differently to dietary changes.

For more information, visit www.biomedcentral.com.